|

Friend of Member Edwin
Solano
May 19, 2010
Mr. John Tonelli,
Executive Director
Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct
Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex
3rd Floor, North Wing
P.O. Box 037
Trenton, NJ 08625
Dear Mr. Tonelli:
I would like to bring this matter to your attention. I believe my friend
Kewal Chopra, who is supposed to be under the care of the court and the
office of the Public Guardian of New Jersey, is in a worst situation
than before they took over.
Enclosed are documents from previous correspondences. The current
predicament of Mr. Chopra raises more questions than answers.
In 2005, Mr. Chopra went to India to visit his relatives and properties.
Mr. Chopra instructed me to prepare one of his houses located at 38
College Street, Jersey City, New Jersey. He was to donate it
to Rutgers University Foundation and in return, he will get an annuity
from it. He intimated to me that he would also like his other two houses
to be fixed for rentals. I was reimbursed for my expenses by his
accountant James Weeks.
Mr. Chopra made a SPOA in early 2005 for Yvonne le Rougatel, a very
close friend who helped manage his finances and James Weeks, who they
take care of the bills and maintain his properties. Unfortunately,
Yvonne passed away in mid-2005, leaving James Weeks as the sole
financial undertaker of Mr. Chopra under that SPOA. Thus, Mr. Chopra’s
problem was born.
Before he was under the custody of the Office of Public Guardian of New
Jersey, Mr. Chopra used to religiously go to the bank and does his
groceries once a week He goes to the post office every other day to get
his mails. Mr. Chopra also drives and likes to run his other cars at
least once a week. He is never a danger to himself or to his estate nor
to others
In 2006, before Social Services came into the life of Kewal Chopra,
receives pensions as a retired math professor and ceramics engineer from
Rutgers University. Now, he is just a very old, isolated man and a
virtual prisoner in his own house.
Annual Income:
Social Security
benefit $17,000.00
New Jersey Pension
benefit 2,000.00
Rutgers Charitable
Gift Annuity 24,040.00
Dividends from shares
of stocks 12,000.00
Total Annual
Income $55,040.00
During that time
also, Mr. Chopra has the following receivables which I believe were
already paid and received:
State of
New Jersey for right of way
$12,176.89 (attachment1)
Yvonne Le
Rougatel’s Will 60,000.00
He also has the
following shares of stocks:
Global
Resource Investment
$196,226.40 as of 4/06 (attachment2)
Westminster Securities
$ 43,459.88 as of 9/06 (attachment3)
Total
$239,686.28
Estimated Valued of
Mr. Chopra’s net worth is $ 3 million.
Please note that
James Weeks is very much aware of all these things.
Questions:
Why did
Debbie Cutrone, Senior Investigator of APS, understated the value of
Chopra’s properties by reporting less than half of its real value. Only
$150,000.00 in shares of stocks and $1.15 million in value of real
estate? Please see (attachment4)
Why
were five of his properties sold at low appraised value?
Under
the authority and watch of Commissioner Helen Dodick, ALL the properties
of Kewal Chopra in New York and Jersey City were either left in very
poor condition, or sold at very low prices (enclosed copy of tax record)
e.g., the property in 36 College Street was sold for $191,000.00 by OPG,
It was flipped over and sold within a year for $315,000.00, for a
clear profit of $124,000.00. (attachment5) Four other properties were
sold in the same year. Where did the proceeds go?
Is
there a committee that monitors the Office of the Guardian? If there is,
what are they doing in the obviously criminal treatment of Mr. Chopra’s
person and property? How are income and expenses reported?
Why were his friends, who have long term relationship with Mr. Chopra,
not allowed to testify on his behalf in the guardianship proceedings?
Why only strangers without any long term or meaningful relationship with
him allowed? Is it because every one would negate their charges of
incapacity leveled against Mr. Chopra?
Why are
friends whom Mr. Chopra desires to talk and see banned to visit or not
allowed to even talk to him on the phone?
Dr.
Kurani rendered his professional judgment that Mr. Chopra lacks the
mental capacity to manage his affairs. This was used by the Office of
Public Guardian to justify its custody over the person and property of
Mr. Chopra. Why did then Dr. Kurani accepted personal checks from Mr.
Chopra on two occasions in connection with that professional services
rendered to Mr. Chopra, from which services of Dr. Kurani rendered his
finding of Chopra’s mental incapacity. If he is incapable of managing
his affairs and lacks mental capacity, why did Dr. Kurani then accept
those checks from Mr. Chopra?
Why was
the mental reevaluation of Mr. Chopra after a year, done by an internist
and not a psychiatrist?
Why
were his personal properties such as his car collection, tools,
equipments, photographs, and memorabilia disposed of against his will or
without his knowledge?
Did the
Executor, James Weeks and James Dawson of the Rutgers University
Foundation, Lawrence Rosa of Social Services and Helen Dodick, Lawyer
for the office of the Public Guardian, who later became the
Commissioner, conspired in depriving Mr. Chopra of his alienable right
of enjoyment of the fruit of his labor and property, including his
freedom for the rest of his life?
Why
were guardianship proceedings charges paid from Mr. Chopra’s estate?
This only means that Mr. Chopra is paying lawyers and guardians to
testify against him.
With
Mr. Chopra’s annual pensions, why was there a need to sell his stocks
and properties. His annual pension is more than enough for Mr. Chopra
to have a decent living.
How
much of his money is left? Who does the annual financial report on the
estate of Mr. Chopra?
There are more questions but those that I have listed here are more than
enough for a reasonable mind to order for an immediate and thorough
investigation of the plight of Mr. Kewal Chopra in the hands of an
organized cabal of thieves in the office of PUBLIC GUARDIAN of New
Jersey.
It is clear in this case, how a law , designed primarily to protect the
elderly and their well being, is manipulated and abused by the greed
and corruption of those people , who unfortunately, are the very same
people called by law to implement it.
The abuse of the laws on
guardianship in very prevalent today. Please visit the website
www.StopGuardianAbuse.org. to see
more of these abuses.
Thank you very much for your attention to this matter. If you have
questions or clarification, please do not hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
/s/ Edwin Solano
EDWIN SOLANO,
personal friend of Mr. Chopra
201-658-9169
cc: Dr. Kurani
Deborah Cutrone
FBI
The
Investigators,ABC News
Gov Christie
Indian
Consulate of New York
|
The Adult
Protective Services
(APS)
of
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
at work.
ISOLATE,
MEDICATE, STEAL THE ESTATE
AND LIQUIDATE?
-
IN THE
BEGINNING OF 2005, KEWAL CHOPRA DONATED TO THE RUTGERS
FOUNDATION, ONE OF HIS HOUSES VALUED $240,000 IN
EXCHANGE FOR MONTHLY ANNUITY $2,000 A MONTH FOR LIFE AND
HE MADE THEM BENEFICIARY OF HIS WILL ON ACCOUNT OF THAT.
·
-
MR. CHOPRA
MADE HIS ACCOUNTANT, THE EXECUTOR OF HIS WILL AND A
SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR THE ACCOUNTANT AND
YVONNE LE ROUGATEL.
-
· YVONNE
DIED IN MID-2005. TO ENSURE THE WILL WOULD NOT BE
CHANGED, THE ACCOUNTANT REPORTED MR. CHOPRA TO THE APS
OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND CONSPIRED WITH THE ORGANIZED
GROUP IN THE SYSTEM.
-
· MR.
CHOPRA WAS DECLARED INCOMPETENT, WHEN IN TRUTH HE WAS
NOT, BUT WAS MERELY OLD, AND WAS PUT UNDER GUARDIANSHIP.
THE COURT RETAINED THE SERVICES OF THE ACCOUNTANT. WHO
IMMEDIATELY SOLD $69,000.00. OF MR. CHOPRA’S STOCKS.
NOTE THAT SINCE HE WAS UNDER APS, THE FOUNDATION ONLY
GAVE $4,000.00 TO MR. CHOPRA’S ACCOUNT, AND THEN IT
STOPPED. WHY?
-
· MR.
CHOPRA’S ATTEMPT TO REVOKE THE SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY
AND REVISED HIS FIRST WILL WAS SUCCESSFULLY OPPOSED AND
CONTESTED BY SOCIAL SERVICES. THE LAWYER THEN OF THE
SOCIAL SERVICES IS THE CURRENT ACTING COMMISSIONER OF
THE OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC GUARDIAN.
-
· THE
NEXT FOUR YEARS, MR. CHOPRA WAS GIVEN $300.00 A MONTH
FOR FOOD. HE WAS NOT ALLOWED TO SEE HIS CLOSE FRIENDS
AND WAS PREVENTED TO DO THE USUAL CHORES HE USED TO WHEN
HE WAS NOT UNDER PUBLIC GUARDIANSHIP. IT WAS A LIFE OF
LONELY ISOLATION AND HE VIRTUALLY LIVED LIKE A PAUPER.
WHY?
-
· ON
THE FIFTH YEAR, DOTTY SALMORIN, A CLOSE FRIEND WHO LIVES
WITH MR. CHOPRA, WAS ASKED TO MOVE OUT AND WAS REPLACED
WITH CAREGIVERS 24/7.
-
· ON
THE FIFTH YEAR WITH THE CAREGIVERS, MR. CHOPRA’S BODY
AND HEALTH DETERIORATED; HIS HOUSE WAS CLEANED OF HIS
PERSONAL BELONGINGS. HE WAS GIVEN MEDICATION, WHENEVER
HE ASKS TO SEE HIS PROPERTIES OR FRIENDS.
-
HE WAS NOT ALLOWED TO EXERCISE
AND WAS KEPT IN A DARK ROOM IN THE HOUSE WITH NO TV NOR
RADIO. WHY KEPT MR. CHOPRA ISOLATED, AND IN SUCH DIRE
CONDITIONS, FROM THE LIFE AND PEOPLE HE LOVED?
-
· IN
FIVE YEARS, MORE THAN A MILLION DOLLAR DISAPPEARED WITH
NO EXPLANATION. PROPERTIES WERE SOLD AT LOWBALL PRICES
AND SERVICES WERE PAID TO THE MAX, WITH MINIMAL CARE.
-
· WHAT
HAPPENED TO HIS ANNUITY WORTH $236,000., HIS $40,000
ANNUAL PENSION; HIS SAVINGS AND STOCKS WORTH
$300,000.00; THE PROCEEDS TO HIS PROPERTIES, WORTH A
MILLION DOLLARS, SOLD POSTHASTE AND NEEDLESSLY.
-
· I
HAVE VIDEOS OF MR. CHOPRA A FEW WEEKS BEFORE HE PASSED
AWAY, COMPLAINING OF HIS SITUATION AND HIS GREAT FEAR
FOR HIS LIFE.
-
· GIVEN
THE SITUATION HE WAS MADE TO BEAR, MR. CHOPRA WAS
VIRTUALLY SENTENCED TO DEATH FOR BEING A SENIOR CITIZEN,
WITH LOTS OF MONEY AND ASSETS IN MILLIONS, BUT WITHOUT
ANY OFFSPRING OR RELATIVE HERE IN AMERICA.
-
· NOBODY
KNEW HOW AND WHEN MR. CHOPRA DIED.
-
WHY? WAS THE
BODY OF MR. CHOPRA CREMATED TO COVER UP THEIR THE
CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE HE WAS MADE TO SUFFER?
-
WHAT A COINCIDENCE! THE
LAWYER HIRED BY APS TO HAVE MR. CHOPRADECLARED
INCAPACITATED, WAS THE SAME PERSON LATER APPOINTED BY
THE JUDGE ,WHO APPROVED TO SELL HIS PROPERTIES, TO
BECOME THE COMMISSIONER OF THE OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC
GUARDIAN. SHE WAS THE ONE WHO GAVE ORDERS NOT TO
RESUSCITATE MR. CHOPRA IN CASE OF EMERGENCY. DOES MR.
CHOPRA HAVE A LIVING WILL? WHO SIGNED IT? IS IT
GENUINE?
-
· THE
FOUNDATION WAS LEFT 7 PROPERTIES OUT OF 11 PROPERTIES.
WHY WAS THE FOUNDATION SILENT ALL THE TIME THIS WAS
HAPPENING TO MR. CHOPRA? IS IT COMPLICIT TO SOMETHING
ILLEGAL?
-
THE LIFE AND DEATH OF MR.
CHOPRA WAS CRUEL AND UNLAWFUL UNDER THE OFFICE OF THE
PUBLIC GUARDIAN OF NJ. IT SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED AND
THOSE GUILTY BE BROUGHT BEFORE THE BAR OF THE LAW.
By: Edwin Solano,
Jersey City, NJ
|

Guardianship abuse and conservatorship
abuse IS elder abuse!
|