|

Mother of Member Diane
Wilson
Dorothy Wilson is 85
years old and suffers from early dementia. She is not a stroke victim or
in a wheelchair, and she does not need to be washed or bathed. She
cleans and cooks for herself.
I applied for
guardianship in December, 2008, but my siblings fought this. In March,
2009, a geriatric “care” manager and guardian were assigned to my mother
and she was declared incapacitated. An order was issued for an aide in
her home 24/7, but soon arrangements were made for Mom to stay with
family on weekends. Restricted pickup and return times were ordered,
and although I requested relief many times, but the judge refused
to allow it. His decision was based on the care manager’s assertion that
9am on a Saturday to pickup and 9am on a Monday to return is the only
time the agency, Home Companion Services of Port Jefferson, will
allow.
One aide soon became
Mom’s friend and confidant. On September 15, 2009, the care manager
went to my mother’s house with a new aide that does not drive, and
ordered the other aide to leave or she would call the police. Mom
insisted she did not want Cheri to leave and she was threatened as
well. The guardian claimed she did this for my mother’s “safety”
although nothing had happened.
The court has refused to
allow my mother to stay with family additional days when someone is
available, which is what she wants, and would save her thousands of
dollars in agency fees. No one listens to her or respects her wishes.
After Mom complained to me and her attorney about the violation of her
privacy and HIPPA rights, her attorney advised the judge via letter on
October 30, 2009. False allegations were then made against me by the
guardian and the care manager. On November 10, 2009, the guardian mailed
a letter to me stating that I violated the court orders prohibiting
anyone from discussing costs with Mom and she imposed supervised
visitation.
Mom’s attorney requested
a hearing, which was scheduled for Thanksgiving Eve. Despite the fact
that I told the truth, the judge believed the lies of my siblings, the
aide and the attorney. Since I was acting pro se, my witness was not
allowed to testify. The guardian arranged for my siblings to take Mom
for the Thanksgiving holiday and weekend, preventing my family and I
from seeing her for the holiday. On December 3, the judge ruled that
while there would be no supervised visitation, he stated that I had
absolutely no credibility. This was based on the fact that my mother
wrote letters pleading her case and I was accused of dictating them to
her because my sister advised the guardian that my mother “cannot
write.”
My mother was unhappy
with the “visitation” arrangements that the guardian made for Christmas.
She wrote a letter and called her. After my mother did that, the
guardian sent me a letter refusing to allow my mother to visit with me
and her grandchildren until 5PM on Christmas Day, instead allowing my
siblings to take her for Christmas Eve and Christmas Day.
This is the most
frightening abuse of power I have ever seen. It is virtually impossible
to fight people like this unless you are very wealthy.

|