|

Daughter of Member
Kate Anderson
Two years ago, The Public Guardian and Silvia’s
attorney entered our home without permission, without a warrant and
without notification. These people then performed an illegal search of
the home. After they induced Silvia into saying she wished to live in a
group home. (Silvia had never seen one.) They petitioned the court to
remove her mother as conservator of the person. The court decided that
because her mother was paid IHSS funds for her care, this constituted a
“conflict of interest”. Silvia has lots of other relatives but none of
them were notified by the court or contacted in any way. After two
weeks at the group home, Silvia told her Guardian that she would like to
return to her family. The change of conservatorship was only temporary
at that point. Neither Silvia nor her mother received notification of
the hearing date which made the order permanent. Silvia has constantly
continued to verbalize the wish to return to her family during the two
years. The home she once owned was sold for about $75,000. less than
the market value. Her mother who co owned the home and Silvia’s 12 year
old sister were forced to move out of the home as a condition of the
sale. However, her mother was still responsible for the payments during
the 6 months that it took to sell the home. Silvia was removed from a
community based program she attended and placed in a sheltered workshop
where she had been verbally abused and which has a practice of
administering performance reviews of it’s disabled clients in public.
While at the group home, Silvia was not bathed or
cared for properly and it was discovered that her room mate was sexually
assaulted repeatedly in Silvia’s presence. Only as a result of her
mother’s diligence was Silvia removed. Two weeks before Christmas Silvia
was again cruelly stripped away from her family. It was the eve of her
grandmother’s death and her mother was served with a restraining order
obtained by the Public Guardian using false information.
 |